La Laguna's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,826,140. In 1950, the population of La Laguna was 217,113. La Laguna has grown by 45,550 in the last year, which represents a 2.56% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of La Laguna, which typically includes La Laguna's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 2,123,370 |
| 2034 | 2,102,480 |
| 2033 | 2,081,060 |
| 2032 | 2,059,080 |
| 2031 | 2,036,470 |
| 2030 | 2,013,050 |
| 2029 | 1,988,550 |
| 2028 | 1,962,530 |
| 2027 | 1,934,360 |
| 2026 | 1,902,430 |
| 2025 | 1,866,580 |
| 2024 | 1,826,140 |
| 2023 | 1,780,590 |
| 2022 | 1,729,820 |
| 2021 | 1,674,260 |
| 2020 | 1,614,850 |
| 2019 | 1,553,030 |
| 2018 | 1,490,480 |
| 2017 | 1,428,920 |
| 2016 | 1,369,900 |
| 2015 | 1,313,160 |
| 2014 | 1,258,850 |
| 2013 | 1,206,780 |
| 2012 | 1,156,940 |
| 2011 | 1,109,020 |
| 2010 | 1,063,160 |
| 2009 | 1,042,510 |
| 2008 | 1,024,430 |
| 2007 | 1,006,620 |
| 2006 | 989,148 |
| 2005 | 971,975 |
| 2004 | 955,124 |
| 2003 | 938,520 |
| 2002 | 922,227 |
| 2001 | 906,216 |
| 2000 | 890,505 |
| 1999 | 874,265 |
| 1998 | 857,895 |
| 1997 | 841,831 |
| 1996 | 826,089 |
| 1995 | 810,599 |
| 1994 | 795,421 |
| 1993 | 780,527 |
| 1992 | 765,931 |
| 1991 | 751,569 |
| 1990 | 737,496 |
| 1989 | 717,652 |
| 1988 | 695,887 |
| 1987 | 674,724 |
| 1986 | 654,232 |
| 1985 | 634,363 |
| 1984 | 615,124 |
| 1983 | 596,417 |
| 1982 | 578,304 |
| 1981 | 560,740 |
| 1980 | 543,734 |
| 1979 | 519,929 |
| 1978 | 496,651 |
| 1977 | 474,414 |
| 1976 | 453,201 |
| 1975 | 432,882 |
| 1974 | 413,501 |
| 1973 | 394,987 |
| 1972 | 377,326 |
| 1971 | 360,409 |
| 1970 | 344,272 |
| 1969 | 335,010 |
| 1968 | 330,443 |
| 1967 | 325,926 |
| 1966 | 321,477 |
| 1965 | 317,088 |
| 1964 | 312,766 |
| 1963 | 308,491 |
| 1962 | 304,279 |
| 1961 | 300,126 |
| 1960 | 296,035 |
| 1959 | 287,268 |
| 1958 | 278,468 |
| 1957 | 269,938 |
| 1956 | 261,680 |
| 1955 | 253,654 |
| 1954 | 245,884 |
| 1953 | 238,352 |
| 1952 | 231,061 |
| 1951 | 223,974 |
| 1950 | 217,113 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 217,113 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 223,974 | 3.16% | 6,861 |
| 1952 | 231,061 | 3.16% | 7,087 |
| 1953 | 238,352 | 3.16% | 7,291 |
| 1954 | 245,884 | 3.16% | 7,532 |
| 1955 | 253,654 | 3.16% | 7,770 |
| 1956 | 261,680 | 3.16% | 8,026 |
| 1957 | 269,938 | 3.16% | 8,258 |
| 1958 | 278,468 | 3.16% | 8,530 |
| 1959 | 287,268 | 3.16% | 8,800 |
| 1960 | 296,035 | 3.05% | 8,767 |
| 1961 | 300,126 | 1.38% | 4,091 |
| 1962 | 304,279 | 1.38% | 4,153 |
| 1963 | 308,491 | 1.38% | 4,212 |
| 1964 | 312,766 | 1.39% | 4,275 |
| 1965 | 317,088 | 1.38% | 4,322 |
| 1966 | 321,477 | 1.38% | 4,389 |
| 1967 | 325,926 | 1.38% | 4,449 |
| 1968 | 330,443 | 1.39% | 4,517 |
| 1969 | 335,010 | 1.38% | 4,567 |
| 1970 | 344,272 | 2.76% | 9,262 |
| 1971 | 360,409 | 4.69% | 16,137 |
| 1972 | 377,326 | 4.69% | 16,917 |
| 1973 | 394,987 | 4.68% | 17,661 |
| 1974 | 413,501 | 4.69% | 18,514 |
| 1975 | 432,882 | 4.69% | 19,381 |
| 1976 | 453,201 | 4.69% | 20,319 |
| 1977 | 474,414 | 4.68% | 21,213 |
| 1978 | 496,651 | 4.69% | 22,237 |
| 1979 | 519,929 | 4.69% | 23,278 |
| 1980 | 543,734 | 4.58% | 23,805 |
| 1981 | 560,740 | 3.13% | 17,006 |
| 1982 | 578,304 | 3.13% | 17,564 |
| 1983 | 596,417 | 3.13% | 18,113 |
| 1984 | 615,124 | 3.14% | 18,707 |
| 1985 | 634,363 | 3.13% | 19,239 |
| 1986 | 654,232 | 3.13% | 19,869 |
| 1987 | 674,724 | 3.13% | 20,492 |
| 1988 | 695,887 | 3.14% | 21,163 |
| 1989 | 717,652 | 3.13% | 21,765 |
| 1990 | 737,496 | 2.77% | 19,844 |
| 1991 | 751,569 | 1.91% | 14,073 |
| 1992 | 765,931 | 1.91% | 14,362 |
| 1993 | 780,527 | 1.91% | 14,596 |
| 1994 | 795,421 | 1.91% | 14,894 |
| 1995 | 810,599 | 1.91% | 15,178 |
| 1996 | 826,089 | 1.91% | 15,490 |
| 1997 | 841,831 | 1.91% | 15,742 |
| 1998 | 857,895 | 1.91% | 16,064 |
| 1999 | 874,265 | 1.91% | 16,370 |
| 2000 | 890,505 | 1.86% | 16,240 |
| 2001 | 906,216 | 1.76% | 15,711 |
| 2002 | 922,227 | 1.77% | 16,011 |
| 2003 | 938,520 | 1.77% | 16,293 |
| 2004 | 955,124 | 1.77% | 16,604 |
| 2005 | 971,975 | 1.76% | 16,851 |
| 2006 | 989,148 | 1.77% | 17,173 |
| 2007 | 1,006,620 | 1.77% | 17,472 |
| 2008 | 1,024,430 | 1.77% | 17,810 |
| 2009 | 1,042,510 | 1.76% | 18,080 |
| 2010 | 1,063,160 | 1.98% | 20,650 |
| 2011 | 1,109,020 | 4.31% | 45,860 |
| 2012 | 1,156,940 | 4.32% | 47,920 |
| 2013 | 1,206,780 | 4.31% | 49,840 |
| 2014 | 1,258,850 | 4.31% | 52,070 |
| 2015 | 1,313,160 | 4.31% | 54,310 |
| 2016 | 1,369,900 | 4.32% | 56,740 |
| 2017 | 1,428,920 | 4.31% | 59,020 |
| 2018 | 1,490,480 | 4.31% | 61,560 |
| 2019 | 1,553,030 | 4.2% | 62,550 |
| 2020 | 1,614,850 | 3.98% | 61,820 |
| 2021 | 1,674,260 | 3.68% | 59,410 |
| 2022 | 1,729,820 | 3.32% | 55,560 |
| 2023 | 1,780,590 | 2.93% | 50,770 |
| 2024 | 1,826,140 | 2.56% | 45,550 |
| 2025 | 1,866,580 | 2.21% | 40,440 |
| 2026 | 1,902,430 | 1.92% | 35,850 |
| 2027 | 1,934,360 | 1.68% | 31,930 |
| 2028 | 1,962,530 | 1.46% | 28,170 |
| 2029 | 1,988,550 | 1.33% | 26,020 |
| 2030 | 2,013,050 | 1.23% | 24,500 |
| 2031 | 2,036,470 | 1.16% | 23,420 |
| 2032 | 2,059,080 | 1.11% | 22,610 |
| 2033 | 2,081,060 | 1.07% | 21,980 |
| 2034 | 2,102,480 | 1.03% | 21,420 |
| 2035 | 2,123,370 | 0.99% | 20,890 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,300 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,680 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,360 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,340 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,340 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,220 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,440 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,140 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,080 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,820 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,130 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,650 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,980 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,300 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,170 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,340 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,570 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,000 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,770 | 1.35% |