Chihuahua's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,135,340. In 1950, the population of Chihuahua was 87,475. Chihuahua has grown by 19,040 in the last year, which represents a 1.71% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Chihuahua, which typically includes Chihuahua's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,299,220 |
| 2034 | 1,286,440 |
| 2033 | 1,273,360 |
| 2032 | 1,259,960 |
| 2031 | 1,246,240 |
| 2030 | 1,232,180 |
| 2029 | 1,217,740 |
| 2028 | 1,202,860 |
| 2027 | 1,187,450 |
| 2026 | 1,170,910 |
| 2025 | 1,153,540 |
| 2024 | 1,135,340 |
| 2023 | 1,116,300 |
| 2022 | 1,096,430 |
| 2021 | 1,075,860 |
| 2020 | 1,054,770 |
| 2019 | 1,033,380 |
| 2018 | 1,011,950 |
| 2017 | 990,749 |
| 2016 | 969,988 |
| 2015 | 949,606 |
| 2014 | 929,680 |
| 2013 | 910,172 |
| 2012 | 891,099 |
| 2011 | 872,375 |
| 2010 | 854,070 |
| 2009 | 837,345 |
| 2008 | 821,079 |
| 2007 | 805,085 |
| 2006 | 789,425 |
| 2005 | 774,068 |
| 2004 | 759,032 |
| 2003 | 744,247 |
| 2002 | 729,769 |
| 2001 | 715,573 |
| 2000 | 701,673 |
| 1999 | 686,370 |
| 1998 | 670,458 |
| 1997 | 654,914 |
| 1996 | 639,752 |
| 1995 | 624,901 |
| 1994 | 610,414 |
| 1993 | 596,263 |
| 1992 | 582,458 |
| 1991 | 568,937 |
| 1990 | 555,747 |
| 1989 | 540,406 |
| 1988 | 524,496 |
| 1987 | 509,012 |
| 1986 | 494,006 |
| 1985 | 479,442 |
| 1984 | 465,327 |
| 1983 | 451,590 |
| 1982 | 438,276 |
| 1981 | 425,355 |
| 1980 | 412,832 |
| 1979 | 398,187 |
| 1978 | 383,892 |
| 1977 | 370,110 |
| 1976 | 356,841 |
| 1975 | 344,014 |
| 1974 | 331,664 |
| 1973 | 319,757 |
| 1972 | 308,293 |
| 1971 | 297,211 |
| 1970 | 286,541 |
| 1969 | 275,769 |
| 1968 | 265,077 |
| 1967 | 254,772 |
| 1966 | 244,880 |
| 1965 | 235,372 |
| 1964 | 226,246 |
| 1963 | 217,450 |
| 1962 | 209,008 |
| 1961 | 200,893 |
| 1960 | 193,104 |
| 1959 | 178,787 |
| 1958 | 165,136 |
| 1957 | 152,527 |
| 1956 | 140,896 |
| 1955 | 130,124 |
| 1954 | 120,188 |
| 1953 | 111,011 |
| 1952 | 102,546 |
| 1951 | 94,706 |
| 1950 | 87,475 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 87,475 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 94,706 | 8.27% | 7,231 |
| 1952 | 102,546 | 8.28% | 7,840 |
| 1953 | 111,011 | 8.25% | 8,465 |
| 1954 | 120,188 | 8.27% | 9,177 |
| 1955 | 130,124 | 8.27% | 9,936 |
| 1956 | 140,896 | 8.28% | 10,772 |
| 1957 | 152,527 | 8.26% | 11,631 |
| 1958 | 165,136 | 8.27% | 12,609 |
| 1959 | 178,787 | 8.27% | 13,651 |
| 1960 | 193,104 | 8.01% | 14,317 |
| 1961 | 200,893 | 4.03% | 7,789 |
| 1962 | 209,008 | 4.04% | 8,115 |
| 1963 | 217,450 | 4.04% | 8,442 |
| 1964 | 226,246 | 4.05% | 8,796 |
| 1965 | 235,372 | 4.03% | 9,126 |
| 1966 | 244,880 | 4.04% | 9,508 |
| 1967 | 254,772 | 4.04% | 9,892 |
| 1968 | 265,077 | 4.04% | 10,305 |
| 1969 | 275,769 | 4.03% | 10,692 |
| 1970 | 286,541 | 3.91% | 10,772 |
| 1971 | 297,211 | 3.72% | 10,670 |
| 1972 | 308,293 | 3.73% | 11,082 |
| 1973 | 319,757 | 3.72% | 11,464 |
| 1974 | 331,664 | 3.72% | 11,907 |
| 1975 | 344,014 | 3.72% | 12,350 |
| 1976 | 356,841 | 3.73% | 12,827 |
| 1977 | 370,110 | 3.72% | 13,269 |
| 1978 | 383,892 | 3.72% | 13,782 |
| 1979 | 398,187 | 3.72% | 14,295 |
| 1980 | 412,832 | 3.68% | 14,645 |
| 1981 | 425,355 | 3.03% | 12,523 |
| 1982 | 438,276 | 3.04% | 12,921 |
| 1983 | 451,590 | 3.04% | 13,314 |
| 1984 | 465,327 | 3.04% | 13,737 |
| 1985 | 479,442 | 3.03% | 14,115 |
| 1986 | 494,006 | 3.04% | 14,564 |
| 1987 | 509,012 | 3.04% | 15,006 |
| 1988 | 524,496 | 3.04% | 15,484 |
| 1989 | 540,406 | 3.03% | 15,910 |
| 1990 | 555,747 | 2.84% | 15,341 |
| 1991 | 568,937 | 2.37% | 13,190 |
| 1992 | 582,458 | 2.38% | 13,521 |
| 1993 | 596,263 | 2.37% | 13,805 |
| 1994 | 610,414 | 2.37% | 14,151 |
| 1995 | 624,901 | 2.37% | 14,487 |
| 1996 | 639,752 | 2.38% | 14,851 |
| 1997 | 654,914 | 2.37% | 15,162 |
| 1998 | 670,458 | 2.37% | 15,544 |
| 1999 | 686,370 | 2.37% | 15,912 |
| 2000 | 701,673 | 2.23% | 15,303 |
| 2001 | 715,573 | 1.98% | 13,900 |
| 2002 | 729,769 | 1.98% | 14,196 |
| 2003 | 744,247 | 1.98% | 14,478 |
| 2004 | 759,032 | 1.99% | 14,785 |
| 2005 | 774,068 | 1.98% | 15,036 |
| 2006 | 789,425 | 1.98% | 15,357 |
| 2007 | 805,085 | 1.98% | 15,660 |
| 2008 | 821,079 | 1.99% | 15,994 |
| 2009 | 837,345 | 1.98% | 16,266 |
| 2010 | 854,070 | 2% | 16,725 |
| 2011 | 872,375 | 2.14% | 18,305 |
| 2012 | 891,099 | 2.15% | 18,724 |
| 2013 | 910,172 | 2.14% | 19,073 |
| 2014 | 929,680 | 2.14% | 19,508 |
| 2015 | 949,606 | 2.14% | 19,926 |
| 2016 | 969,988 | 2.15% | 20,382 |
| 2017 | 990,749 | 2.14% | 20,761 |
| 2018 | 1,011,950 | 2.14% | 21,201 |
| 2019 | 1,033,380 | 2.12% | 21,430 |
| 2020 | 1,054,770 | 2.07% | 21,390 |
| 2021 | 1,075,860 | 2% | 21,090 |
| 2022 | 1,096,430 | 1.91% | 20,570 |
| 2023 | 1,116,300 | 1.81% | 19,870 |
| 2024 | 1,135,340 | 1.71% | 19,040 |
| 2025 | 1,153,540 | 1.6% | 18,200 |
| 2026 | 1,170,910 | 1.51% | 17,370 |
| 2027 | 1,187,450 | 1.41% | 16,540 |
| 2028 | 1,202,860 | 1.3% | 15,410 |
| 2029 | 1,217,740 | 1.24% | 14,880 |
| 2030 | 1,232,180 | 1.19% | 14,440 |
| 2031 | 1,246,240 | 1.14% | 14,060 |
| 2032 | 1,259,960 | 1.1% | 13,720 |
| 2033 | 1,273,360 | 1.06% | 13,400 |
| 2034 | 1,286,440 | 1.03% | 13,080 |
| 2035 | 1,299,220 | 0.99% | 12,780 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,300 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,680 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,360 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,340 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,340 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,220 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,440 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,140 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,080 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,820 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,130 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,650 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,980 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,300 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,170 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,340 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,570 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,000 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,770 | 1.35% |